The United States Will Remain a Corporate Site Location Powerhouse in 2020
The Montrose Group, LLC
The United States will remain a corporate site location powerhouse in 2020 ignoring the chaos of a presidential election and continued trade disputes based upon the analysis of the Montrose Group for what trends are apparent for corporate site location in 2020. Corporate site location projects are more likely in nations and regions with a growing economy. Economic growth creates the wealth that attracts capital and workers. Slow growth regions are often unattractive to companies considering economic consolidation and expansion projects.
Companies considering a corporate site location project will first determine if the nation under consideration is growing from an economic perspective. Measures of a nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the tool used to determine whether this nation is growing. GDP is the monetary value of all the finished goods and services produced within a country’s borders in a specific time period and includes anything produced by the country’s citizens and foreigners within its borders.
From a national perspective, the United States will remain the dominant global economy. According to Investopedia, the U.S. has retained its position of being the world’s largest economy since 1871. The size of the U.S. economy was at $20.49 T in 2018 in nominal terms and is expected to reach $21.35 T in 2019. The U.S. is often dubbed as an economic superpower and that’s because the economy constitutes almost a quarter of the global economy, backed by advanced infrastructure, technology, and an abundance of natural resources. The gap between the size of the world’s two largest economies in terms of nominal GDP is expected to lessen by 2023; the U.S. economy is projected to grow to $24.81 T by 2023, followed closely by China at $19.71 T.
According to the St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank, after showing considerable strength in the first quarter of 2019, the pace of real GDP growth has since slowed modestly. Labor market conditions remain healthy, as the number of job openings continues to outpace the number of unemployed people. By contrast, inflation has remained low. Although the U.S. economy is exhibiting trend-like growth, many businesses continue to face brisk headwinds related to the trade tussle with China and slowing global growth. The consensus of professional forecasters is that real GDP growth will dip below 2% in 2020 and that inflation will modestly firm closer to the Fed’s target rate. But if the headwinds facing the economy diminish, then modestly stronger growth is possible in 2020. The United States economic growth will likely out-perform Europe, with estimated growth at 1.8%, China is likely to slow growth to below 6%, and Japan will continue its economic struggles with growth projected in 2020 below 1%.
According to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), employment is projected to grow by 8.4 M jobs to 169.4 M jobs over the 2018–28 decade, in the U.S. This expansion reflects an annual growth rate of 0.5 %, which is slower than the 2008–18 annual growth rate of 0.8 %. An aging population and labor force will contribute to changes expected over the coming decade including a continued decline in the labor force participation rate and continued growth in employment in healthcare and related industries and occupations. Real GDP is projected to grow at much the same rate from 2018 to 2028 as it did in the previous decade; labor productivity is projected to accelerate slightly from the previous decade to an annual rate of 1.6 %, higher than the previous decade’s annual rate of 1.3 %.
The United States’ continued economic growth is driven by a number of factors. America remains a global manufacturing leader. According to the St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank, the United States and seven other developed countries make up about 82 % of OECD manufacturing activity: Those countries are France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, South Korea, and the United Kingdom. In 1997, the real manufacturing output of all eight countries was $3.97 T. U.S. output was a little more than a third of this total, with Japan accounting for a little more than a quarter. Germany provided 14 %, followed by Italy’s nearly 8 %. The other countries were less than 6 % each. By 2015, the U.S. share had risen to about 36 %. The shares of Mexico and South Korea had risen slightly and Germany’s share hadn’t changed much. All other OECD countries saw their share of manufacturing output decline, with Japan’s share declining nearly 3 percentage points. By this standard, U.S. manufacturing is competing well against the manufacturing sectors of other large, developed countries. However, China is not included in this OECD analysis. According to the World Bank, China surpassed the United States in 2014 as the world’s largest manufacturing country in value-added terms. By 2015, China’s real manufacturing output totaled $4.18 T, considerably more than the $3.25 T in U.S. output. Thus, while China has surpassed the United States in manufacturing output, the U.S. remains a global manufacturing leader and this sector will continue to be a prime driver of the U.S. economy in 2020.
In addition, the United States has long maintained a dramatic advantage in growing and developing companies in a variety of technology related industries. The basis for much of this growth is the American venture capital marketplace that provides the funding these early-stage companies need to succeed. As the recent PwC/CB Insights MoneyTree Report indicates, North America, driven by the United States, has a long-term dominance over Europe and Asia when it comes to venture capital funding of technology startups. There is no reason for this to change entering 2020. In the first three quarters of 2019, venture capital investments in the United States totaled more than Asia and Europe combined.
More importantly, economic data released during the last week of December 2019 indicated the much-anticipated recession is looking less and less likely. Conclusion of the first phase of the China trade deal would likely settle the stock market but the trade dispute has not fundamentally harmed the American economy. While the Presidential Election will certainly dominate the headlines and the winner may well decimate America’s economy if the Democrats elect a far-left candidate, harm to the 2020 corporate site location marketplace is doubtful to be caused by the election. The United States will remain a growth market and compares well to global competitors from a macroeconomic standpoint in 2020.
Housing demand outstrips supply so much that developers can be – and are – very selective about where they choose to invest. Factors like land price, annexation and zoning processes, infrastructure costs, density, and community design specs will make or break a developer’s go-or-no-go decision. This panel discussion will provide insights into developers’ decision-making processes, as well as help direct the focus of local economic developers to those areas in which they can add value in housing discussions.
The Call for Presentations for the OEDA Annual Summit to be held September 4-6, 2024, at the Glass City Center in Toledo, Ohio, is now open. The Annual Summit offers a unique platform to highlight innovative solutions, spark discussions, and share impactful strategies that have positively influenced communities. The Annual Summit organizers are seeking speakers to provide a variety of high quality educational sessions to attendees.
The Ohio Economic Development Association has announced JP Nauseef and Dr. Ned Hill as the keynote presenters for the upcoming Ohio Basic Economic Development Course, April 29-May 2, in Dublin, Ohio. JP Nauseef, the President and CEO of JobsOhio, which has been described as the “best in class state economic development partnership,” will welcome the Basic Course students and Keynote the course. Dr. Ned Hill, a recognized national expert in economic growth, regional development, and economic development, will kick off the course by covering “What is Economic Development and What is the Job of an Economic Development Professional?”